🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."